I’ve been attending a bible study that I can stomach...well,
at least two times so far. We aren’t fearful of disagreeing with each other.
The people that attend represent a variety of theological stances, church
backgrounds, cultures, and ethnicities. I’m not afraid to swear or say things
that might be considered offensive in some more conservative circles.
Christianese (you know, language Christians often use that people who haven’t
grown up in the church culture wouldn’t understand) isn’t regularly spoken there.
Communion is served at each study. And the fact that the Ruthruffs (the hosts)
serve delicious food before each study definitely doesn’t hurt.
More so lately, I’ve had a pretty big aversion towards the
practice and explanations of Christian tradition and orthodoxy that seem to
exclude anybody who doesn’t immediately understand church or Christianity as a
whole. In other words, I’ve been feeling something of a hate (and I think hate
is a strong word, but for now it seems most representative of how I feel most
times) for things that make a holy huddle. It’s my opinion that Christian
practice should always seek to be relevant beyond a myopic and ingrown culture
and/or worldview; ultimately representing a Christ that embraces the “other.”
Today we talked about the paschal meal – a recreation of the
Passover Meal (which commemorates the Exodus of the Israelites as they were
freed from slavery) that became the last supper of Christ. Historically, and in
my own personal experience, these types of conversations usually leave me with a
bitter taste in my mouth, the flavor of not having met some sort of Christian
quota mixed with equal part shame and emotional self-flagellation. So when
today’s discussion of the paschal meal led towards the topic of Lent, fasting,
the exodus, identity formation, how we bear shame, and where God fits in without
reverting to simple bible quoting, and included multiple self-disclosures of personal
struggles in believing aspects of God and God’s actions in our lives – I became
alive and engaged.
A few things surfaced in my mind as a result of the
conversation.
In reading, “When he
was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to
give it to them. Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him, and he
disappeared from their sight” (Luke 24:30-31), we discussed how slowing down
from the day’s activities to eat with those close to us can help us “unplug”
from the static and hum of life which can sometimes act as a barrier toward
mindfulness and attunement towards self. The act of intentionally eating with
others can help us feel and recognize the physical and relational nurturing we all
long for and need. Isn’t that what the act of abstaining in Lent is intended
for? To not feel full anymore. To reconnect with our longings, and as a result
see the shitty parts of our lives, who has been M.I.A, how we’ve been falling
short, having our mommy and daddy issues surface, various traumas, etc., and then be able to sincerely ask, “So
what now God?” Maybe when the disciples received the bread they really felt the
“So what now God?” and as a result were finally able to see their answer in the presence of the resurrected Christ.
I mean, how often do we in our efforts to tune out the hurtful parts of our
life also tune out God’s presence in those hurtful parts? Maybe if we slowed
down enough to feel what is floating in the undercurrent we might also have our
eyes opened and recognize Christ.
I’ll end this post by submitting to the blogosphere a photo
project I came across on the interwebs. “Dinner in NY” is a series of
photographs by Miho Aikawa portraying various dinner times. I wonder how these
people, in their eating practices, might also be practicing connectedness or
dissociation. Do any of the photos remind you of your dinner times?